Nothing could be further from the truth. Here's what he said:
"There may be a basis in the case of some individuals, as perhaps when a male prostitute uses a condom, where this can be a first step in the direction of a moralization, a first assumption of responsibility, on the way toward recovering an awareness that not everything is allowed and that one cannot do whatever one wants. But it is not really the way to deal with the evil of HIV infection. That can really lie only in a humanization of sexuality.
Are you saying, then, that the Catholic Church is actually not opposed in principle to the use of condoms?
She of course does not regard it as a real or moral solution, but, in this or that case, there can be nonetheless, in the intention of reducing the risk of infection, a first step in a movement toward a different way, a more human way, of living sexuality."(source)
B16 is saying that by using condoms, you are not, not, I repeat, NOT doing good, but rather trying to do good. By using condoms to fight AIDS, you have good intentions, but are still doing evil.
Liberals/progressivists/moderists/those wishing to "update" and "revise" Church teaching think they have won a key battle in getting the last remaining Christian group to allow condoms, but condoms are still intrinsically evil and condom use is always a mortal sin. The Church cannot change what is and what isn't a sin. Only God can do that. B16 isn't claiming to do that. B16 is NOT a heretic. He condemns condoms in these quotes. It's just that those opposed to tradition only read what they want to read because they want the Church to surrender to the world on moral issues and legalize condoms. The problem is that the Church does not have the jurisdiction to do such a thing.